Climate campaign group Insure our Future has said the global insurance market is making it hard for coal projects to find cover but more needs to be done.
The group has published its fourth annual scorecard on insurers’ climate policies which found the market’s retreat from coal coverage has continued.
The good news is tempered however as the report, Insuring Our Future: The 2020 Scorecard on Insurance, Fossil Fuels and Climate Change, said although momentum is growing, it falls short of what is needed to drive action to meet international climate targets.
“Major companies in the US, the Lloyd’s market and East Asia are still insuring coal, and the global insurance industry has so far failed to take comprehensive action on oil and gas,” it warned.
The scorecard found most European and Australian insurers no longer provide cover for new coal projects, while others are becoming more cautious and restricting capacity. Coal companies are facing rate increases of up to 40%, according to broker Willis Towers Watson.
“The insurance industry has a unique power to drive the transition to a low-carbon economy by only insuring projects that are consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5°C,” it said.
Since the Insure Our Future campaign launched in 2017, at least 23 companies have ended or limited their cover for coal projects, representing 12.9% of the primary insurance market2 and 48.3% of the reinsurance market.
Insurers are also divesting from coal: at least 65 insurers with combined investments worth $12 trillion — likely to be more than 40% of the industry’s total assets3 — have either adopted a divestment policy or committed to making no new coal investments. This is up from $4 trillion in 2017.
Peter Bosshard, Coordinator of the Insure Our Future campaign, says: “Insurers’ continuing shift away from fossil fuels is positive, but in the face of a worsening climate crisis it needs to accelerate. Laggards like Lloyd’s, AIG and Tokio Marine must stop insuring coal now, and all insurers need to phase out support for the oil and gas industry.”
Global broker Willis Towers Watson has reported that even insurers who continue to cover coal are becoming more cautious after many years of losses and are reducing capacity. “The extent of an Insured’s coal-related operations is becoming an increasingly dominant factor in determining whether insurers will provide cover,” it said.
For the first time, this year’s scorecard evaluates insurers’ commitments on oil and gas as well as coal. Just nine insurers have limited or ended cover for tar sands oil – up from four last year – and Australia’s Suncorp is the first and only company to announce a phase-out of all oil and gas coverage.
Lucie Pinson, Executive Director of Reclaim Finance, says: “European insurers have led the industry’s retreat from coal and now they must step up and lead action on oil and gas. Allianz, AXA, Munich Re and Zurich have pledged to align their investment portfolios with 1.5°C, and if they are serious about this target they must stop insuring and investing in companies which plan new oil and gas production.”
Burning coal is responsible for 40% of CO2 emissions not related to land use, but oil and gas combined are responsible for 55%, and building any new fossil fuel projects is not consistent with a 1.5°C pathway.5,6 The shrinking coal market demonstrates the impact insurers can have on fossil fuel development, and the highly concentrated oil and gas insurance sector is vulnerable.
Ten insurers cover about 70% of the global oil and gas market, the biggest being AIG, Travelers, Zurich and Lloyd’s. However, companies controlling 45% of the market have already moved away from coal, and a quarter of the market is provided by insurers that back a 1.5°C climate target, said Insure Our Future.
The scorecard revealed that momentum is growing globally but with big regional differences. US insurers continue to lag behind their global peers. Liberty Mutual and The Hartford restricted coal insurance in the last year, following Chubb and AXIS Capital, but their policies are significantly weaker than those of leading European insurers.
AIG, Berkshire Hathaway, Travelers and other U.S. insurers have not taken any action on fossil fuels at all. All 10 US insurers in the scorecard continue to support organisations lobbying against climate action.
In Europe, Lloyd’s of London remains a major target for the group’s actions. While the market has divested coal from its own central fund Insure Our Future said the market has given no direction to the 90-plus syndicates that make up 97% of its market, and it remains a major source of coal insurance.
Flora Rebello Arduini, Senior Campaigner Consultant, SumOfUs, said: “Lloyd’s of London and its members insure and invest in some of the world’s worst fossil fuel projects. While its European counterparts have led the way on climate action and withdrawn from coal, Lloyd’s has stepped in to provide insurance that no one else will. There is no pride in being the insurer of last resort for a dying and destructive industry, Lloyd’s must stop its legacy of climate destruction.”
The scorecard report ranks 30 leading insurers, collectively assessing and scoring their policies on underwriting and investing in fossil fuels. It is based on responses to a survey from 20 companies and on publicly available information. It finds that:
· Underwriting: AXA and Swiss Re are the leaders in ending fossil fuel insurance, followed by Hannover Re, Zurich and Munich Re. Most of their policies address both coal and tar sands. However, AIG, Berkshire Hathaway, Lloyd’s, Sinosure, Travelers and W.R. Berkley underwrite coal without any restrictions.
· Divestment: SCOR and AXA lead on divestment followed by Swiss Re, Allianz and Zurich. All but Allianz cover tar sands as well as coal, and some exclude investments in any company that plans new projects. Sixteen other insurance companies assessed in this report have less comprehensive coal divestment policies and only nine continue to invest in the coal sector.
· Climate leadership: Legal & General achieved the highest score for other climate leadership – which focuses on insurers’ commitments to align their businesses with a 1.5 °C pathway. Aviva, Zurich, Munich Re, QBE and AXA also score well. Thirteen insurers, including all 10 US companies, received negative scores because they continue to support organisations lobbying against climate action.